Ongoing experiment. Observations are recorded before events and results afterwards — including the failures. Nothing here is investment advice.

August 2026: a high-fit cycle, and where the low actually formed

Reconstructed archive entry. It describes 30 August 2026, and was published on this site on 22 September 2026. It was written up from contemporaneous records after the fact — this site did not publish it on the historical date.

The August 2026 cycle was noted at the time as a high-fit cycle: a Pattern Fit
Score of about 82.6/100 before the waning leg completed, described then as
roughly the 97th historical percentile.

A note on that figure. 82.6/100 is the number recorded contemporaneously. The
scoring implemented in this codebase today produces a different figure for the
same cycle. Both are kept. Re-tuning the scoring so it reproduces a historical
number would breach the research constitution, which forbids changing scoring
weights after the fact.

What the verified market data shows:

  • New Moon 12 August 2026, 17:36 UTC, close $63,402.43.
  • The cycle low was $62,818.65 on 2026-08-16.
  • Full Moon 28 August 2026, 04:18 UTC, close $77,830.29,
    and it was strongly nodally aligned - 5.0 degrees from the lunar node.
  • The cycle high was $81,271.74 on 2026-09-03,
    a 29.4% advance from the low.

The formal New-Moon test: a qualifying strict local low DID form, at NM+2.

Applying the pre-registered rule - a strict 7-day pivot on the daily LOW,
LOW[t] < LOW[t-1..t-3] AND LOW[t] < LOW[t+1..t+3] - to verified daily OHLC:

Date Daily LOW Qualifies?
12 Aug (T0) $63,251.11 no
13 Aug (T+1) $62,799.29 no
14 Aug (T+2) $62,487.70 yes
15 Aug (T+3) $62,850.96 no

The contemporaneous note - "12 Aug New Moon -> 14 Aug local low" - was
correct. The qualifying pivot is 14 August, NM+2.

Note that 16 August printed a lower close ($62,818.65) than 14 August.
That is irrelevant to this test. The protocol is defined on intraday lows and
asks whether a strict local low formed in T0:T+3 - not whether that day held
the lowest price of the cycle. A later, deeper low does not retract a pivot that
has already formed.

Historical high-fit cycles suggested elevated weakness in the waning leg, commonly
nearer 10-15% than a crash. That expectation is recorded here before the outcome
is discussed, and reviewed in the experiment record.

An observation, not a prediction. Recorded as part of an ongoing public experiment and not investment advice.